Skipping a superclass
Miles Kaufmann
milesck at umich.edu
Sun Aug 2 21:15:10 EDT 2009
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have a series of subclasses like this:
>
> class A(object):
> def method(self, *args):
> print "Lots of work gets done here in the base class"
>
> class B(A):
> def method(self, *args):
> print "A little bit of work gets done in B"
> super(B, self).method(*args)
>
> class C(B):
> def method(self, *args):
> print "A little bit of work gets done in C"
> super(C, self).method(*args)
>
>
> However, the work done in C.method() makes the work done in B.method()
> obsolete: I want one to run, or the other, but not both. C does need
> to
> inherit from B, for the sake of the other methods, so I want
> C.method()
> *only* to skip B while still inheriting from A. (All other methods
> have
> to inherit from B as normal.)
This might not be applicable to the larger problem you're trying to
solve, but for this sample, I would write it as:
class A(object):
def method(self, *args):
self._method(*args)
print "Lots of work gets done here in the base class"
def _method(self, *args):
pass # or perhaps raise NotImplemented
class B(A):
def _method(self, *args):
print "A little bit of work gets done in B"
class C(B):
def _method(self, *args):
print "A little bit of work gets done in C"
> So what I have done is change the call to super in C to super(B, self)
> instead of super(C, self). It seems to work, but is this safe to do?
> Or
> are there strange side-effects I haven't seen yet?
In a diamond-inheritance situation, you may end up skipping methods
besides just B.method().
-Miles
More information about the Python-list
mailing list