"Byte" type?

Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com
Sun Feb 15 16:32:33 CET 2009


Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Steve Holden <steve <at> holdenweb.com> writes:
>> Beware, also, that in 2.6 the "bytes" type is essentially an ugly hack
>> to enable easier forward compatibility with the 3.X series ...
> 
> It's not an ugly hack. It just isn't all that you might hope it'd live up to be.
> 
I take it back
It's not an ugly hack
It's just an aliased type

regards
 Steve
-- 
Steve Holden        +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC              http://www.holdenweb.com/




More information about the Python-list mailing list