Re: 'u' Obselete type – it is identical to 'd'. (7)

[John Machin]

On Feb 25, 4:48 am, mathieu <mathieu.malate... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I did not know where to report that:
>
> 'u'     Obselete type – it is identical to 'd'.       (7)
>
> http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting


So what's your problem with that? Do you believe that 'u' is not
accepted? That 'u' is not identical to 'd' and thus the doc should be
rewritten as "its behaviour is identical to that of 'd'"? That the
behaviour of 'u' is NOT identical to that of 'd'? That 'u' should not
be documented? That 'u' should not be described as obselete?