x64 speed
Robin Becker
robin at reportlab.com
Wed Feb 4 05:14:56 EST 2009
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> I follow David's guess that Linux does better IO than Windows (not
>>> knowing anything about the benchmark, of course)
>>>
>> I originally thought it must be the vmware host stuff offloading IO to
>> the second core, but watching with sysinternals didn't show a lot of
>> extra stuff going on with the vm compared to just running on the host.
>
> I'm not talking about vmware. I'm suggesting that Linux ext3, and the
> Linux buffer handling, is just more efficient than NTFS, and the Windows
> buffer handling.
>
> If you split the total runtime into system time and user time, how do
> the 30s split up?
.......
so here is one for the vm clock is bad theorists :)
> [rptlab at localhost tests]$ time python25 runAll.py
> .............................................................
.........................
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 193 tests in 27.841s
>
> OK
>
> real 0m28.150s
> user 0m26.606s
> sys 0m0.917s
> [rptlab at localhost tests]$
magical how the total python time is less than the real time.
--
Robin Becker
More information about the Python-list
mailing list