Is c.l.py becoming less friendly?

[Richard Levasseur]

On Feb 5, 8:02 am, Dan Upton <up... at virginia.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, mk <mrk... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > (duck)
>
> > 542 comp.lang.python rtfm
>
> > 467 comp.lang.python shut+up
>
> > 263 comp.lang.perl rtfm
>
> > 45 comp.lang.perl shut+up
>
> But over how many messages for each group?  Wouldn't the percentage of
> messages containing those be more interesting than the raw number? ;p

As would the percent of threads that ultimately have "GIL" within the
last, oh, say 20% of their messages :)