multiprocessing vs thread performance
philip at semanchuk.com
Thu Jan 1 01:28:43 CET 2009
On Dec 31, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Aaron Brady <castironpi at gmail.com> writes:
>> I had an idea. You could use 'multiprocessing' for synchronization,
>> and just use an mmap for the actual communication. (I think it's a
>> good idea.)
> Are you reinventing POSH? (http://poshmodule.sourceforge.net)
Or sysv_ipc? Or posix_ipc?
Bug fix version of the latter coming out in a day or two...
More information about the Python-list