multiprocessing vs thread performance

Philip Semanchuk philip at
Thu Jan 1 01:28:43 CET 2009

On Dec 31, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:

> Aaron Brady <castironpi at> writes:
>> I had an idea.  You could use 'multiprocessing' for synchronization,
>> and just use an mmap for the actual communication.  (I think it's a
>> good idea.)
> Are you reinventing POSH?  (

Or sysv_ipc? Or posix_ipc?

Bug fix version of the latter coming out in a day or two...

More information about the Python-list mailing list