Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

r rt8396 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 22:54:45 CET 2009


[stevie]
On the other hand... Bruno's question is unfair. It is perfectly
reasonable to (hypothetically) consider Python to be the best
*existing*
language while still wanting it to be improved (for some definition
of
improvement). Just because somebody has criticisms of Python, or a
wish-
list of features, doesn't mean they hate the language.
[/stevie]

WOW Steven, i am very impressed. That's the first thing you have said
in a very long time that i totally agree with! Keep this up and i may
put you back on my Python Brethren list :)




More information about the Python-list mailing list