Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
rhodri at wildebst.demon.co.uk
Thu Jan 15 04:42:08 CET 2009
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:09:37 -0000, Russ P. <Russ.Paielli at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that would indeed be nice. I am certainly not the only one who
> could use a language that is excellent for both research prototyping
> *and* the final, safety-critical system. Then perhaps the prototype
> could just be cleaned up and "hardened" for the end product rather
> than rewritten in another language -- by programmers in another state
> who may fail to understand many of the details that the prototype
> developer agonized over.
You should always plan on throwing away your prototype anyway (though
few people do), because *something* in the architecture will turn out
to be not what you thought. And if the programmers in the other state
fail to understand the details, maybe the developer should have
documented a whole lot more (he says through gritted teeth, having
had the original code as the sole documentation far too many times).
We return you to your regularly scheduled original point...
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeeste Herder to the Masses
More information about the Python-list