Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
James Mills
prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Thu Jan 15 01:07:46 EST 2009
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michele Simionato
<michele.simionato at gmail.com> wrote:
(...)
> It could just be an issue of practicality. Python is an industrial
> strength language with libraries for everything and you can use it for
> your daily work. There are nice little languages out there that are
> however not usable for real work because of lack of libraries/lack of
> support/small community etc.
So _exactly_ how does this thread relate to the
subject: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
--JamesMills
More information about the Python-list
mailing list