Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

Steven D'Aprano steven at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au
Thu Jan 15 07:18:29 CET 2009


On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:07:46 +1000, James Mills wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michele Simionato
> <michele.simionato at gmail.com> wrote:
> (...)
> 
>> It could just be an issue of practicality. Python is an industrial
>> strength language with libraries for everything and you can use it for
>> your daily work. There are nice little languages out there that are
>> however not usable for real work because of lack of libraries/lack of
>> support/small community etc.
> 
> So _exactly_ how does this thread relate to the subject: Does Python
> really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

If you had followed the thread since the beginning, you'd see that the 
topic has evolved (or perhaps strayed) from the original subject.


-- 
Steven



More information about the Python-list mailing list