Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
steven at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au
Thu Jan 15 07:18:29 CET 2009
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:07:46 +1000, James Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michele Simionato
> <michele.simionato at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It could just be an issue of practicality. Python is an industrial
>> strength language with libraries for everything and you can use it for
>> your daily work. There are nice little languages out there that are
>> however not usable for real work because of lack of libraries/lack of
>> support/small community etc.
> So _exactly_ how does this thread relate to the subject: Does Python
> really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
If you had followed the thread since the beginning, you'd see that the
topic has evolved (or perhaps strayed) from the original subject.
More information about the Python-list