Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
rt8396 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 19:15:40 CET 2009
On Jan 15, 11:59 am, Paul Rubin <http://phr...@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:
> r <rt8... at gmail.com> writes:
> > So what was the fatal error, care to post a traceback?
> Usually it's "expected to find some value but got None", or got a
> list, or expected some structure but got a different one, or some
> field was missing, etc. It's not a single traceback, it's a recurring
> theme in developing this stuff.
Sounds like the results of poor testing and lack of design good
More information about the Python-list