Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
rhodri at wildebst.demon.co.uk
Fri Jan 16 02:41:09 CET 2009
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:07:00 -0000, Paul Rubin
> Luis Zarrabeitia <kyrie at uh.cu> writes:
>> No, copy and paste from the original data structures would eliminate
> The whole point is that would be possible if Python had data structure
> definitions ("types") that were possible to copy and paste from some
> single location, instead of building up structures dynamically, adding
> fields on the fly in ways that have become obscure over the evolution
> of the code.
mutter mutter __slots__ mutter mutter
It strikes me that what you actually want to write is the script that
scans your C data structure and spits out a Python class or module that
implements it with whatever degree of checking you want. That should
make writing your actual data munger safer and faster, if I'm
understanding you correctly.
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeeste Herder to the Masses
More information about the Python-list