Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

Paul Rubin http
Fri Jan 16 17:19:47 CET 2009


mk <mrkafk at gmail.com> writes:
> I was flabbergasted to read that optional static typing was dropped by
> Guido due to "lack of interest in community" IIRC.

I don't remember that happening.  PEP 3107 still lists type checking
as a use case for Python 3.0 function annotations.



More information about the Python-list mailing list