Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
Russ.Paielli at gmail.com
Tue Jan 20 06:17:19 CET 2009
On Jan 19, 8:32 pm, Luis Zarrabeitia <ky... at uh.cu> wrote:
> Quoting "Russ P." <Russ.Paie... at gmail.com>:
> > On Jan 19, 7:44 pm, <david.l... at preisshare.net> wrote:
> > > [removing david's message]
> > Why did you email your post to me? Did you really think I wanted to
> > see it in my inbox? I assure you I did not.
> Don't get mad at him... and don't take it personal. The reply-to header of this
> mailing list (usenet users: for some of us, this is only a mailing list, and
> can't hope for more) points to the sender, and not the list. Many believe it is
> the right thing to do, but if your mailer doesn't have a 'reply to list'
> function, like the one I'm using right now (Horde/Imp), your only option is to
> reply-to-all and then delete the original sender. I can't blame anyone for
> forgetting about the last part.
You're right. I shouldn't have gotten mad at him. I took his post as a
jab at me, but after thinking about it I realized it probably wasn't.
More information about the Python-list