Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
wuwei23 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 05:26:39 CET 2009
On Jan 21, 1:18 pm, "Russ P." <Russ.Paie... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Since when is no one is allowed to suggest a potential improvement to
> a product unless they are willing to implement it themselves? Imagine
> what the world would be like if such a rule applied to all products.
It wasn't the suggestion so much as the claim that integration of the
behaviour was "relatively easy". Everything is "relatively easy" when
you're not the one doing it.
My mistake for using "trivial" instead, I didn't realise it would trip
up your pedantry.
More information about the Python-list