Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

James Mills prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Wed Jan 21 07:02:37 CET 2009


On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Paul Rubin
<"http://phr.cx"@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> James Mills <prologic at shortcircuit.net.au> writes:
>> Actually - in case you are perfectly unaware - programming
>> languages -do not- bare meaning to such systems nor have
>> an impact on their suitability or unsuitability.
>
> Er, who do you think you are trying to fool, saying things like that?
> Maybe just yourself.

Paul unless you can prove otherwise, refuting my statement
is useless. Claiming that Python may or may not be suitable
for safety critical systems or large scale systems is unfounded.

--JaemsMills



More information about the Python-list mailing list