Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?

Russ P. Russ.Paielli at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 01:23:36 EST 2009


On Jan 20, 10:02 pm, alex23 <wuwe... at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can I comprehend that you don't even have an immediate need and are
> instead actively engaging in online onanism? Absolutely.

So anyone thinking beyond an "immediate need" is "engaging in online
onanism"?

Let's see. How long ago did the Python community start thinking about
Python 3?

So I guess they're all a bunch of jerkoffs, eh?



More information about the Python-list mailing list