Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
Russ.Paielli at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 07:32:57 CET 2009
On Jan 20, 10:18 pm, James Mills <prolo... at shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
> I never did say that python -is- suitable for
> all applications or that all languages are suitable
> for all purposes.
But you did make some rather outlandish statements. I had written
> I suggest you call Boeing and tell them that encapsulation is more
> trouble than it's worth for their 787 flight software. But please
> don't do it if you ever wish to work for them, because you will be
> proving conclusively that you don't have a clue about the kind of
> software systems they produce.
And you wrote this little gem in reply:
I am 100% confident that those same systems could be
well written in a language such as Python and would very
likely end up being much smaller and more manageable.
More information about the Python-list