English-like Python
Scott David Daniels
Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org
Wed Jan 21 15:50:43 EST 2009
Benjamin J. Racine wrote:
> I think it would be a good step if you could make some sensible interpretation of a typical statement without its parentheses.
>
> f "abc" 123
> -->
> f( "abc", 123 )
>
> It would be just the thing in a couple of situations... though it does conflict with raw-string literals as stated: r"abc"... which if you left open, would be susceptible to a local definition of r!. Maybe you could put it after, like numeric literals: 123L, "abc"r, which is not bad.
Surely this would require that
f( "abc", 123 )
-->
f(("abc", 123))
Or would you require that tuple-formation is "special"?
--Scott David Daniels
Scott.Daniels at Acm.Org
More information about the Python-list
mailing list