missing 'xor' Boolean operator
Wed Jul 15 19:25:25 CEST 2009
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic at xemacs.org> writes:
> > While everyone's trying to tell the OP how to workaround the missing
> > xor operator, nobody answered the question "why is there no [boolean]
> > xor operator ?".
> Probably because there isn't one in C. The bitwise XOR operator, on the
> other hand, exists in both C and Python.
A non-bitwise XOR really sounds almost useless.
More information about the Python-list