Why re.match()?

[Diez B. Roggisch]

kj schrieb:
> In <4a4e2227$0$7801$426a74cc at news.free.fr> Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.42.desthuilliers at websiteburo.invalid> writes:
> 
>> kj a �crit :
>> (snipo
>>> To have a special-case
>>> re.match() method in addition to a general re.search() method is
>>> antithetical to language minimalism,
> 
>> FWIW, Python has no pretention to minimalism.
> 
> Assuming that you mean by this that Python's authors have no such
> pretensions:
> 
> "There is real value in having a small language."
> 
> 			Guido van Rossum, 2007.07.03
> 			http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-July/008663.html
> 
> So there.
> 
> BTW, that's just one example.  I've seen similar sentiments expressed
> by Guido over and over and over: any new proposed enhancement to
> Python must be good enough in his mind to justify cluttering the
> language.  That attitude counts as minimalism in my book.
> 
> The best explanation I have found so far for re.match is that it
> is an unfortunate bit of legacy, something that would not be there
> if the design of Python did not have to be mindful of keeping old
> code chugging along...

language != libraries.

Diez