multi-core software

Red Forks redforks at gmail.com
Fri Jun 5 11:56:35 CEST 2009


Single - thread programming is great! clean, safe!!!
I'm trying schedual task to several work process (not thread).
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:49 AM, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:

> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
>> ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.lang.lisp.]
>> On 2009-06-04, Roedy Green <see_website at mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Xah Lee <xahlee at gmail.com>
>>> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>>>
>>>  • Why Must Software Be Rewritten For Multi-Core Processors?
>>>>
>>> Threads have been part of Java since Day 1.
>>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, not sane threads designed by people who actually understand
>> multithreading.
>>
>>  The nice thing about Java is whether you are on a single core
>>> processor or a 256 CPU machine (We got to run our Athena Integer Java
>>> spreadsheet engine on such a beast), does not concern your code.
>>>
>>
>> You are dreaming if you think that there are any circumstances (other than
>> circumstances in which performance doesn't matter) in which you don't have
>> to
>> concern yourself about the difference between a uniprocessor and a 256 CPU
>> machine.
>>
>
> If you're interested in parallel programming, have a look at Flow-Based
> Programming:
>
> http://www.jpaulmorrison.com/fbp/
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20090605/9341bb54/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-list mailing list