Making the case for repeat
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Mon Jun 8 11:44:30 CEST 2009
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:30:37 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano <steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au> writes:
>> On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:46:23 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> > We factor code to eliminate redundancy, but that is not always a good
>> > idea with an API. The goal for code factoring is to minimize
>> > redundancy. The goal for API design is having simple parts that are
>> > easily learned and can be readily combined (i.e. the notion of an
>> > iterator algebra).
>> Wonderfully said! That has articulated something which I only recently
>> came to appreciate, but couldn't put into words.
> As originally defined by Martin Fowler, re-factoring always means the
> external behaviour is unchanged <URL:http://refactoring.com/>.
> So, there's no such thing as a re-factoring that changes the API.
> Anything that changes an external attribute of the code is a different
> kind of transformation, not a re-factoring.
Possibly a *factoring*, without the "re-", just like Raymond said.
Also, keep in mind that when creating a new API, you have no existing API
More information about the Python-list