SPAM-LOW: Re: Function/method returning list of chars in string?
robert.kern at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 00:17:14 CEST 2009
On 2009-06-09 17:06, Carl Banks wrote:
> On Jun 9, 12:42 pm, Terry Reedy<tjre... at udel.edu> wrote:
>> Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
>>> I should have known - you use a string method to get a list of words,
>>> but you have to go to the list to get a list of characters from a string.
>> That is symmetry.
>>> There is no string method to do it, which is what I am complaining
>> That would be asymmetry.
>>> Is there a reason for this, or is the lack of symmetry just an historical
>> A lack of perception to see the symmetry that is there.
>> Classes create instances of the class when called.
>> Sometimes alternate constructors are needed when there is more than one
>> possible way to create an instance from a given input. In the case of
>> str(iterable), one could want either a string representing the iterable
>> itself, just as with non-iterables, or a string representing the
>> concatenated contents of the iterable. Str.join implements the second
>> choice, with an added string parameter to allow a constant string to be
>> interpolated between the joined items.
> But then how do you rationalize str.split(), which is a method of str
> but a constructor of list?
There is a difference between a "constructor of a type" and just "a method that
returns a particular type". str.join() and str.split() are really examples of
> Perhaps instead of worrying about symmetry all the time we should just
> accept the inevitability that things will always be asymmetric and
> impure from someone's perspective. Terry's symmetry is Hendrik's
> asymmetry and vice versa.
There is much wisdom in this.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Python-list