Status of Python threading support (GIL removal)?
pavlovevidence at gmail.com
Sat Jun 20 05:16:17 EDT 2009
On Jun 19, 4:35 pm, a... at pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> In article <157e0345-74e0-4144-a2e6-2b4cc854c... at z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>,
> Carl Banks <pavlovevide... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >I wish Pythonistas would be more willing to acknowledge the (few)
> >drawbacks of the language (or implementation, in this case) instead of
> >all this rationalization.
> Please provide more evidence that Pythonistas are unwilling to
> acknowledge the drawbacks of the GIL.
I will not, since I was not making an assertion, but an observation
that some Pythonistas ignore (and even outright dismiss) claims that
Python has a drawback by countering with a suggestion that they should
be doing it some other, often more obtuse, way anyway--and expressing
a wish that I could observe this less often.
More information about the Python-list