No trees in the stdlib?

[CTO]

On Jun 26, 1:29 am, Tom Reed <tomree... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Whynotrees in the standard library, if not as a built in? I searched
> the archive but couldn't find a relevant discussion. Seems like a
> glaring omission considering the batteries included philosophy,
> particularly balanced binary search trees.Nointerest,nogood
> implementations, something other reason? Seems like a good fit for the
> collections module. Can anyone shed some light?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Tom

I've written a graph library (trees being rooted connected acyclic
graphs)
called Graphine that you could try. Obviously not a part of the
standard
library, but it (or networkx) will almost certainly do what you're
looking
for. You can find graphine at graphine.org, or networkx at
networkx.lanl.gov.

Geremy Condra