RichCompare and RichCompareBool

[Aaron Brady]

On Mar 7, 10:39 pm, Steven D'Aprano <st... at pearwood.info> wrote:
> Aaron Brady wrote:
> > Hi.  Just bringing it up again.  I feel the docs should mention it at
> > least, and there should possibly be a separate function.
>
> Post a bug report or feature request on the tracker, or nothing will happen.
>
> If you include a patch, odds of it being approved are greatly increased.
>
> --
> Steven

I'm not quite sure how to handle it.  The existing function is useful,
widely used, and misnamed.  The existing calls should call the
auxiliary function, and RichCompareBool should get a new
implementation.

Actually, I question whether all of them are correctly calling the
auxiliary anyway.