invalid at invalid
Mon Mar 9 14:18:45 CET 2009
On 2009-03-09, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Grant Edwards <grante at visi.com> wrote:
>> I didn't say that he hadn't authorized that assumption. ??I
>> just said that the code does rely on such an assumption. ??In
>> my experience, assumptions like that result broken code down
>> the road.
> And assumptions like "when assumptions fail, it is save to go by the
> letter of the requirement" don't?
If the requirement is wrong, then it doesn't really matter what
Grant Edwards grante Yow! OVER the underpass!
at UNDER the overpass!
visi.com Around the FUTURE and
More information about the Python-list