pataphor at gmail.com
Tue Mar 31 17:06:22 CEST 2009
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Alex_Gaynor <alex.gaynor at gmail.com> wrote:
> My inclination would be to more or less *just* have it implement the
> set API, the way ordered dict does in 2.7/3.1.
As far as I can tell all that would be needed is read/write access to
two key variables: The iterator start position and the underlying map.
There is no need for more than basic set API since people can use
those two variables to subclass their own iterators.
More information about the Python-list