I'm intrigued that Python has some functional constructions in the language.

Lawrence D'Oliveiro ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand
Fri May 8 23:48:58 CEST 2009

In message <gu269i$16if$1 at adenine.netfront.net>, namekuseijin wrote:

> Carl Banks escreveu:
>> 2. However, functional programming is cryptic at some level no matter
>> how nice you make the syntax.
> When your program is nothing but function definition and function
> application, syntax is meaningless.

On the contrary, syntax is vital to the correct interpretation of functional constructs. See, for example, 

More information about the Python-list mailing list