I'm intrigued that Python has some functional constructions in the language.
namekuseijin at gmail.com
Sat May 9 02:16:35 CEST 2009
On May 8, 6:48 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l... at geek-
> In message <gu269i$16i... at adenine.netfront.net>, namekuseijin wrote:
> > Carl Banks escreveu:
> >> 2. However, functional programming is cryptic at some level no matter
> >> how nice you make the syntax.
> > When your program is nothing but function definition and function
> > application, syntax is meaningless.
> On the contrary, syntax is vital to the correct interpretation of functional constructs. See, for example,
Yeah, it's important in an imperative language to have predefined
syntax to allow you to do things. Point taken.
More information about the Python-list