4 hundred quadrillonth?
clp2 at rebertia.com
Fri May 22 00:36:07 CEST 2009
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Carl Banks <pavlovevidence at gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 21, 2:05 pm, seanm... at gmail.com wrote:
>> The explaination in my introductory Python book is not very
>> satisfying, and I am hoping someone can explain the following to me:
>> >>> 4 / 5.0
>> 4 / 5.0 is 0.8. No more, no less.
> That would depend on how you define the numbers and division.
> What you say is correct for real numbers and field division. It's not
> true for the types of numbers Python uses, which are not real numbers.
> Python numbers are floating point numbers, defined (approximately) by
> IEEE 754, and they behave similar to but not exactly the same as real
> numbers. There will always be small round-off errors, and there is
> nothing you can do about it except to understand it.
>> It bothers me.
> Oh well.
> You can try Rational numbers if you want, I think they were added in
> Python 2.6. But if you're not careful the divisors can get
> ridiculously large.
The `decimal` module's Decimal type is also an option to consider:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, May 14 2009, 16:34:51)
>>> from decimal import Decimal
More information about the Python-list