introspection question: get return type

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Marco Mariani a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> 
>> Oh, you meant the "return type" ? Nope, no way. It just doesn't make 
>> sense given Python's dynamic typing.
> 
> I thought that the OP was writing a tool to document not-very-dynamic code.

>
> Unless he's really trying to write in Nohtyp,

You meant "Notype" ?-)

> the language where value 
> types are more important than values ;)

Hence it's name !-)