Using logging module for conditional nested logs
reckoner at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 00:14:54 CET 2009
On Nov 4, 1:30 pm, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa... at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 7:40 pm, Reckoner <recko... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I hope that made some sense.
> Not especially :-(
> Sorry I don't understand exactly what you mean, because I find your
> terminology confusing. For example, "logger that is attached to foo2"
> - loggers are not attached to functions. "It responds to the 'root'
> logger" - what responds? What's meant by "respond"?
> Loggers correspond to specific code components in an application.
> Normally these areas are modules and sometimes they're classes.
> You can certainly treat functions as areas but this will typically
> become unwieldy in any sizeable application. It doesn't (in general)
> make sense to have a specific logger for foo1 for use only when it's
> called by foo2. These seem like anti-patterns to me.
> Handlers are attached to loggers to make events logged via those
> loggers available to different audiences - via console, file, email
> If you want to log that foo1 is being called by foo2, you can do this.
> For example, you could have a utility function which walks (a
> sufficient part of) the call stack to see the function call hierarchy,
> then log this as additional information (e.g. using the 'extra'
> parameter to the logging call). You can attach Filters to loggers and
> handlers which use this information to decide where and whether to
> actually record the event.
> As well as the Python logging documentation, you may also find the
> following link useful:
> Vinay Sajip
I appreciate your patience, as I am new to this.
Your comments have put me on the right track. I will look at the link
More information about the Python-list