The ol' [] * 500 bug...
doomster at knuut.de
Sat Nov 14 16:13:08 CET 2009
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> kj schrieb:
>> lol = [ for _ in xrange(500)]
> If you call that hideous, I suggest you perform the same exercise in
> Java or C++ - and then come back to python and relax....
I might be missing something that's not explicitly mentioned here, but I'd
say that all non-associative containers in C++ have a resize() method, some
even taking an initial size in their constructor.
That said, []*500 is IMHO more readable.
More information about the Python-list