Documentation bugs in 3.1 - C-API - TypeObjects

["Martin v. Löwis"]

DreiJane wrote:
> Thanks a second time - the picture has
> gotten clearer indeed. But for third-party
> readers the complexities of this matter
> require the correction, that
> 
> "Py_Type(&Foo_Type) = &PyType_Type"
> 
> must be:
> "Py_TYPE(&Foo_Type) = &PyType_Type "
> 
> - or am i completely wrong ? Joost

No, you are right - I forgot that the spelling had been
changed to upper case.

Regards,
Martin