python simply not scaleable enough for google?

sturlamolden sturlamolden at yahoo.no
Mon Nov 16 05:51:29 CET 2009


On 16 Nov, 05:09, John Nagle <na... at animats.com> wrote:

>       Python is a very clean language held back from widespread use by slow
> implementations.  If Python ran faster, Go would be unnecessary.

That boggles me.

NASA can find money to build a space telescope and put it in orbit.
They don't find money to create a faster Python, which they use for
analyzing the data.

Google is a multi-billion dollar business. They are using Python
extensively. Yes I know about Unladen Swallow, but why can't they put
1 mill dollar into making a fast Python?

And then there is IBM and Cern's Blue Brain project. They can set up
the fastest supercomputer known to man, but finance a faster Python?
No...

I saw this myself. At work I could get money to buy a € 30,000
recording equipment. I could not get money for a MATLAB license.

It seems software and software development is heavily underfinanced.
The big bucks goes into fancy hardware. But fancy hardware is not so
fancy without equally fancy software.



















More information about the Python-list mailing list