semantics of ** (unexpected/inconsistent?)
Mel
mwilson at the-wire.com
Sun Nov 29 20:26:47 EST 2009
Esmail wrote:
> Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:56:41)
> [GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>
>
> >>> -3**2
> -9
>
> >>> x = -3
>
> >>> x**2
> 9
> >>>
>
> I would have expected the same result in both cases.
>
> Initially I would have expected -3**2 to yield 9, but I can accept
> that ** binds tighter than the unary -, but shouldn't the results
> be consistent regardless if I use a literal or a variable?
When you say ** binds tighter than unary -, you're also saying that -3 isn't
a literal: it's an expression. Try
y=3
-y**2
Mel.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list