Twisted PB vs JMS
jacopo.pecci at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 15:07:48 CEST 2009
I looked at Twisted PB for an architecture with one client
distributing some processing to several servers. Now I came across JMS
and I have seen that using ActiveMQ with the Stomp protocol there
would be a good support for Python.
Surprising I couldn’t find any article comparing the two
technologies. I wonder if they target different problems (it doesn’t
look to me).
Is anyone able to sketch advantages of one solution against the other?
More information about the Python-list