datetime.datetime. or datetime. ?

niklasr niklasro at
Fri Oct 9 00:11:04 CEST 2009

On Oct 8, 5:25 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de... at> wrote:
> NiklasRTZ schrieb:
> > Hello, my basic question is which recommendation is after slight
> > restructuring datetime.datetime to datetime
> > Both works but only one should be chosen probably adjust my package to
> > comply to dependencies.
> > Spec integrated code where refactored to
> >
> > set rather
> > from datetime import datetime, timedelta
> > than
> > import datetime
> > or no matter and completely flexible (then why gae error that
> > datetime.datetime wasn't datetime?)
> > Naturally better not to customize external dependencies but seemingly
> > impossible to use both for a little xmpp project.
> > Thanks with best regards
> Some remarks:
>   - whitespace is significant. In python. And in posting here.
>   - please show us the exact traceback you get, and a minimal example
> that produces it.
>   - how to import is mostly a matter of taste, as long as you refrain
> from using "from datetime import *"e
> Diez

type object 'datetime.datetime' has no attribute 'datetime' Traceback
(most recent call last):
is flexible, both ways worked just that self complying towards more
professional projects naturally feels right. Above error log seemingly
caused by import datetime instead of from datetime import datetime.
Then changed import and cut the first datetime occurance which looks
good but breaks next sync with other. The project is the crowdguru
xmpp chat test reachable via gae app "classifiedsmarket@
{gmail,appspot}" currently importing
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
instead of
import datetime
Many thanks for the help and all further recommendation
code disponible

More information about the Python-list mailing list