apt.shansen at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 18:13:05 CEST 2009
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Victor Subervi <victorsubervi at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hmm. I didn't bother to look at the "comparison post". The indenting looks
> right to me. I reread my post and I believe my question is straight-forward.
> The crux of the issue is my sentence at the bottom. I believe that details
> what my objective is. Not sure what I should do here. I hope you can clarify
> what it is you want me to clarify.
He was complaining not about your post but a rather extended response Dennis
made to you while trying to help. Which is a particularly asshatish thing to
do, but hey.
Dennis's response isn't really my style of using SQL in Python, but its
perfectly legible and understandable -- both in GMail where I usually read,
and via the link r provided to prove his point, which it doesn't at all. It
looks fine in both.
Either way, I basically do it just the same way Dennis did-- so did that
solve your question? A little bit of table redesign and then recursive calls
between the "items" and "relationships" tables.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list