victorsubervi at gmail.com
Fri Oct 9 18:45:22 CEST 2009
Well, as sometimes happens, the response to Dennis' response caught my
attention (out of context) and I didn't notice Dennis' response! Thanks for
bringing it to my attention. I will look at it tonight, and follow-up
tomorrow after I've had a chance to digest it and work with it. (And thank
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Hansen <apt.shansen at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Victor Subervi <victorsubervi at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Hmm. I didn't bother to look at the "comparison post". The indenting looks
>> right to me. I reread my post and I believe my question is straight-forward.
>> The crux of the issue is my sentence at the bottom. I believe that details
>> what my objective is. Not sure what I should do here. I hope you can clarify
>> what it is you want me to clarify.
> He was complaining not about your post but a rather extended response
> Dennis made to you while trying to help. Which is a particularly asshatish
> thing to do, but hey.
> Dennis's response isn't really my style of using SQL in Python, but its
> perfectly legible and understandable -- both in GMail where I usually read,
> and via the link r provided to prove his point, which it doesn't at all. It
> looks fine in both.
> Either way, I basically do it just the same way Dennis did-- so did that
> solve your question? A little bit of table redesign and then recursive calls
> between the "items" and "relationships" tables.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list