Persistent Distributed Objects
sajmikins at gmail.com
Sun Oct 11 21:02:46 CEST 2009
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:46 PM, John Haggerty <bouncyinc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does pyro work inside of stackless?
I have no idea, but you wouldn't need both. Only one or the other.
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Simon Forman <sajmikins at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:11 AM, John Haggerty <bouncyinc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am interested in seeing how it would be possible in python to have
>> > persistent objects (basically be able to save objects midway through a
>> > computation, etc) and do so across multiple computers.
>> > Something that would allow for memory, disk space, processing power, etc
>> > to
>> > be distributed across the nodes not just for number crunching.
>> > So for example a warehouse program started up on 3 machines one for
>> > adding
>> > orders, one for searching for orders, one for organizing the warehouse
>> > and
>> > them running on a different machine with a single interface.
>> > I've seen evidence about this being done wrt what looks like insanely
>> > complex stuff on this list but I'm wondering if there is something to do
>> > this with any number of nodes and just farm out random classes/objects
>> > to
>> > them?
>> Check out Pyro (Python Remote Objects): http://pyro.sourceforge.net/
>> or perhaps Stackless Python http://www.stackless.com/ (Tasklets can be
>> serialized and passed around.)
More information about the Python-list