restriction on sum: intentional bug?
Alan G Isaac
alan.isaac at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 04:41:20 CEST 2009
> Alan G Isaac<alan.isaac<at> gmail.com> writes:
>> So of course join is better, as originally noted,
>> but that does not constitute a reason to intentionally
>> violate duck typing.
On 10/16/2009 1:03 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> As Stephen pointed out, duck typing is not an absolute.
I do not recall anyone suggesting it was.
Do you? If so, cite them.
More information about the Python-list