victorsubervi at gmail.com
Sat Oct 31 15:13:50 CET 2009
Thanks, Rami, that will work.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Albert Hopkins <marduk at letterboxes.org>wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 20:34 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Fixing ‘time’, ‘datetime’, and ‘calendar’ was the reason for Python 3?
> > No, it wasn't.
> > Or perhaps you mean that any backward-incompatible change was a reason
> > to have Python 3? Even more firmly no. The extent of changes was
> > severely limited to make the transition from Python 2 to Python 3 as
> > painless as feasible, while still meeting the goals of Python 3.
> No, I meant "cleaning up the standard library in spite of
> incompatibilities" was one of the goals of Python3 (PEP 3108).
> Personally I don't see anything wrong with the modules, but that was my
> question to the person who said they should all be integrated but wasn't
> because of incompatibilities.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list