datetime question

Ben Finney ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Sat Oct 31 22:52:48 CET 2009


Albert Hopkins <marduk at letterboxes.org> writes:

> No, I meant "cleaning up the standard library in spite of
> incompatibilities" was one of the goals of Python3 (PEP 3108).

Ah, okay. That PEP is “Standard Library Reorganization”
<URL:http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/>, and is specifically
about removing or renaming modules to “clean up” the library.

I don't think it applies to this conversation, which is not about
renaming nor removing modules.

> Personally I don't see anything wrong with the modules, but that was
> my question to the person who said they should all be integrated but
> wasn't because of incompatibilities.

The changes I'm suggesting would be necessary are to the behaviour of
the ‘time’, ‘datetime’, and ‘calendar’ modules: the types they consume
and produce would be unified. They're not now, which would represent an
incompatible API change, not covered by PEP 3108 nor any Python 2→3 PEP
to my knowledge.

-- 
 \         “Alternative explanations are always welcome in science, if |
  `\   they are better and explain more. Alternative explanations that |
_o__) explain nothing are not welcome.” —Victor J. Stenger, 2001-11-05 |
Ben Finney



More information about the Python-list mailing list