efficient running median

[Janto Dreijer]

On Oct 14, 4:53 pm, Peter Otten <__pete... at web.de> wrote:
> Some numbers:
>
> 10.197 seconds for running_median_scipy_medfilt
> 25.043 seconds for running_median_python
> 13.040 seconds for running_median_python_msort
> 14.280 seconds for running_median_python_scipy_median
> 4.024 seconds for running_median_numpy
> 0.221 seconds for running_median_insort
>
> What would be an acceptable performance, by the way?
>

That's great!
Well, the faster it works, the better. It means I can process more
data before getting frustrated. So if you have a faster version I'd
like to see it :)

Thankyou!
Janto