Q on explicitly calling file.close
rt8396 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 7 01:31:54 CEST 2009
On Sep 6, 1:14 pm, "Jan Kaliszewski" <z... at chopin.edu.pl> wrote:
> 05-09-2009 r <rt8... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > i find the with statement (while quite useful in general
> > practice) is not a "cure all" for situations that need and exception
> > caught.
> In what sense?
*ahem*! in the sense that the with statement (while quite useful in
general practice) is not a "cure all" for situations that need and
exception caught ;-)
> I think that:
> with open(...) as f:
> is equivalent to:
> f = open(...)
> Obviously it doesn't substitute catching with 'except'
My sentiments exactly...?
Get Enlightened -> http://jjsenlightenments.blogspot.com/
More information about the Python-list