CPU usage while reading a named pipe
prosper.spurius at gmail.com
Sat Sep 12 21:01:37 CEST 2009
On Sep 12, 2:54 pm, Ned Deily <n... at acm.org> wrote:
> In article
> <da2362e0-ec68-467b-b50b-6067057d7... at y36g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> Miguel P <prosper.spur... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've been working on parsing (tailing) a named pipe which is the
> > syslog output of the traffic for a rather busy haproxy instance. It's
> > a fair bit of traffic (upto 3k hits/s per server), but I am finding
> > that simply tailing the file in python, without any processing, is
> > taking up 15% of a CPU core. In contrast HAProxy takes 25% and syslogd
> > takes 5% with the same load. `cat < /named.pipe` takes 0-2%
> > Am I just doing things horribly wrong or is this normal?
> > Here is my code:
> > from collections import deque
> > import io, sys
> > WATCHED_PIPE = '/var/log/haproxy.pipe'
> > if __name__ == '__main__':
> > try:
> > log_pool = deque(,10000)
> > fd = io.open(WATCHED_PIPE)
> > for line in fd:
> > log_pool.append(line)
> > except KeyboardInterrupt:
> > sys.exit()
> > Deque appends are O(1) so that's not it. And I am using 2.6's io
> > module because it's supposed to handle named pipes better. I have
> > commented the deque appending line and it still takes about the same
> > CPU.
> Be aware that the io module in Python 2.6 is written in Python and was
> viewed as a prototype. In the current svn trunk, what will be Python
> 2.7 has a much faster C implementation of the io module backported from
> Python 3.1.
> Ned Deily,
> n... at acm.org
Aha, I will test with trunk and see if the performance is better, if
so I'll use 2.6 in production until 2.7 comes out. I will report back
when I have made the tests.
More information about the Python-list