An assessment of the Unicode standard
crculver at christopherculver.com
Tue Sep 15 18:22:30 CEST 2009
Hendrik van Rooyen <hendrik at microcorp.co.za> writes:
> 2) Is about as useful as stating that any Turing complete language and
> processor pair is capable of solving any computable problem, given enough
> time. So why are we not all programming in brainfuck?
Except the amount of circumlocution one language might happen to use
over another is quite limited.
> Or speaking the language of the people who wrote linear B?
You mean Mycenaean Greek? There's still a few million people in Europe
who speak a descendent of that very language.
> When a language lacks a word for a concept like "window", then (I
> believe :-) ), it kind of puts a crimp in the style of thinking that a
> person will do, growing up with only that language.
"Window" goes back to an Anglo-Saxon compound "windeye". Even if a
word does not already exist in a given language for whatever novel
item, the language is capable of creating from its own resources.
More information about the Python-list